Police offer $1K reward for help nabbing suspect in Swissvale homicide | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Police offer $1K reward for help nabbing suspect in Swissvale homicide

Natasha Lindstrom
1406076_web1_web-police.28

Police are seeking the public’s help as they investigate the shooting of a Wilkinsburg man found dead on a Swissvale sidewalk nearly two months ago.

Pittsburgh Crime Stoppers is offering a reward of up to $1,000 for information leading to the prosecution of a suspect linked to the killing of Aris Barclay Vann, who died after he was shot multiple times, officials said Friday.

Swissvale police responded to a 911 call about several shots fired in the 2200 block of Woodstock Avenue shortly after 1:30 a.m. May 19. They found Vann on the ground with gunshot wounds to his chest and extremities, police said.

Police said witnesses reported hearing two men arguing followed by a series of gunshots. Then they saw one man run away.

Police describe the possible suspect as a tall, thin black man with hair in cornrow braids or dreadlocks. He was reported wearing blue jeans and a white T-shirt. He was last seen running from Woodstock Avenue onto Ardmore Street with a gun in his hand.

Allegheny County homicide detectives are investigating.

“There is no known motive at this time,” officials said Friday.

Officials asked anyone with information to call the county police tipline at 1-833-255-8477. Callers can remain anonymous.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.