Police say DNA, debit card, receipt all point to Penn Hills man charged with fatal 2017 crash | TribLIVE.com

Police say DNA, debit card, receipt all point to Penn Hills man charged with fatal 2017 crash

Dillon Carr

A Penn Hills man has been charged with causing the death of a woman driver in a 2017 head-on crash in Pittsburgh’s East Hills neighborhood.

Pittsburgh police charged Taariq Tyler, 22, with homicide by vehicle, reckless endangerment and other related charges on Feb. 22, after determining his rental pick-up truck slammed into Rhoda Everson’s SUV on Nov. 24, 2017, on Frankstown Road.

Everson, 59, died at the scene.

Police found Tyler was going 62 mph in a 35-mph zone on Frankstown when he lost control at a curve and crossed the center line, hitting Everson’s vehicle head on, according to a criminal complaint. Tyler had slowed to 49 mph when the two crashed, police said.

Neither driver was wearing a seat belt, the criminal complaint said.

Police say Tyler abandoned the rental truck and fled the scene.

But, they say, he left behind items later used to help identify him — blood on the airbag, his debit card and a rental agreement with Avis.

An Avis representative told police the truck was due back the day of the crash but Tyler had not contacted them, the complaint said.

Police eventually matched Tyler’s DNA from the blood on the airbag to a cheek swab they got from him in October.

Among the other charges Tyler faces are causing an accident involving death, speeding, reckless driving, involuntary manslaughter, driving with a suspended license, and driving on the wrong side of the road.

A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for March 8.

Court records show Tyler has been charged in different cases for two DUIs, driving without a license, assault and other traffic related charges.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.