Police: Scott man scared women, caused ruckus at apartment complex | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Police: Scott man scared women, caused ruckus at apartment complex

Tom Davidson
1784480_web1_ptr-oddassault02-100919
Courtesy of Allegheny County Jail
James Edward Lipinski James Edward Lipinski

A 34-year-old Scott man resisted officers from four police departments after defecating in a vacant Chatham Park Drive apartment, according to a criminal complaint.

Two women called police to the apartment complex on Sept. 30 because a neighbor knocked on their door and tried to force his way into their apartment, police said.

The neighbor, James Edward Lipinski, wasn’t wearing pants, they told police.

Lipinski told them he needed to get “the laundry man,” which they presumed to be the laundry room near their apartment. They opened the door with the chain bolt on and told him he needed to go to the laundry room.

Lipinski tried to force his way inside and waved his arm inside the door trying to grab the women, who were ultimately able to shut the door and call police, according to the criminal complaint.

When police arrived, the women were visibly shaken.

They told police Lipinski also went into the next door apartment, which was vacant. Inside that apartment, police found a pile of feces.

Police went to Lipinski’s apartment and spoke with his caretaker, an employee of Weiblinger’s Residential Care Inc.

Lipinski denied trying to get into the women’s apartment but admitted to defecating on the floor of the vacant apartment, according to the complaint.

Police had Lipinski clean up the mess, then tried to handcuff him, according to the complaint.

Lipinski tried to spit on one officer and tried to run away after he was handcuffed, police said.

A struggle ensued and Lipinski was able to slip the handcuffs from behind his back to the front of his body. Three officers tried to subdue him, but Lipinski ignored their commands, tried to bite them, and kicked one of the officers, according to the complaint.

Police called for backup and police from Carnegie, Heidelberg and Green Tree assisted. It took eight officers to subdue Lipinski, who resisted five attempts to stun him with a Taser, according to the complaint.

While being transported to the Scott police department, Lipinski again slipped the handcuffs to the front of his body, according to the complaint.

He was placed in leg shackles with his handcuffs on while in the holding cell and banged himself off the walls and door of the cell, according to the complaint.

The director of Weiblinger’s told police Lipinski has “many other issues.”

The director declined to comment for this story.

Lipinski was convicted of arson in 2009 and sentenced to probation in the county’s mental health court, according to online court records.

He now faces three counts of aggravated assault, and single counts of simple assault, burglary, criminal mischief, criminal trespass, resisting arrest and loitering and prowling at night.

Lipinski is in Allegheny County Jail on $100,000 bail awaiting an Oct. 17 preliminary hearing, according to court records.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.