ShareThis Page
Port Authority sends $3M bill to Norfolk Southern for August derailment costs |

Port Authority sends $3M bill to Norfolk Southern for August derailment costs

Megan Guza
Crews working to remove Norfolk Southern freight cars that derailed August 5, 2018, from a track near Station Square.

The Port Authority of Allegheny County is asking Norfolk Southern for $3 million to reimburse costs incurred during the August derailment at Station Square that disrupted light rail traffic for nearly three weeks.

The derailment inconvenienced thousands of riders for weeks, Port Authority CEO Katharine Kelleman said.

“Port Authority, our riders and the local economy paid the price, and we are now asking Norfolk Southern to reimburse us for the cost of repairs,” Kelleman said. “Taxpayers and Port Authority patrons should not be burdened with the repair costs for this unfortunate event.”

A Norfolk Southern freight train derailed Aug. 5, sending its cars and cargo of household products onto the Port Authority T track below. The Station Square T stop and the Monongahela Incline were closed for 20 days.

Port Authority’s breakdown of the costs includes:

  • $1.5 million for contractors.
  • $936000 for Port Authority employee labor.
  • $380,000 for material and equipment.
  • $93,000 in lost revenue.

Norfolk Southern, in a statement, said, the railroad is reviewing the costs. It did not know how long the review would take.

Norfolk Southern officials said in November that a broken rail caused the derailment, and the Federal Railroad Administration has yet to issue its final incident report.

A Jan. 31 letter to Norfolk Southern expressed Port Authority officials’ concerns over the risk of a repeat incident.

“These concerns are heightened by how quickly after the derailment NSC resumed service and the continued use of double-stacking trains on this hillside,” wrote Burton Jennings, Port Authority’s chief safety officer.

He also noted Norfolk Southern’s intention to begin running double-stacking trains on the tracks near the Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway – the same type of train involved in the Station Squire derailment.

The letter asked that Norfolk Southern officials put in writing their new safety measures, “particularly the operation of double-stacked trains … on both the hillside above Station Square and adjacent to (the busway).”

Jennings wrote that the derailment could have been worse if the derailed train struck riders waiting on the platform or a light rail train leaving the station.

Norfolk Southern said it has a “rigorous track inspection program” in place that fully complies with the federal rules.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include responses from Norfolk Southern.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.