Port Vue man pleads guilty to federal drug charges | TribLIVE.com

Port Vue man pleads guilty to federal drug charges

Michael DiVittorio

A Port Vue man charged with possession and conspiring to distribute heroin pleaded guilty to the federal drug charges.

Jarran Bell, 38, pleaded guilty to three counts before U.S. District Court Judge Cathy Bissoon.

Authorities said Bell and his girlfriend, Krystle Barretto, were living together during the investigation, which took place December 2014 through April 2015.

Bell and Barretto maintained numerous other residences, which were used as stash houses, according to investigators. Amanda Santiago lived in one of those residences during the investigative period.

In April 2015, Bell and Barretto orchestrated two large shipments of heroin from Patterson, N.J., back to the McKeesport/Port Vue area. On April 19, 2015, a courier, Amanda Santiago, transported approximately 500 bricks of heroin from Patterson back to McKeesport via taxi cab, authorities said.

Agents executed several search warrants and seized a loaded firearm, approximately five bricks of heroin and a money counter. All of the aforementioned items were seized from the master bedroom of Bell and Barretto. The loaded gun was located in a dresser drawer along with the five bricks of heroin. Barretto was the lawful owner of the firearm.

Santiago pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 30 months in prison. Barretto pleaded guilty and is scheduled to be sentenced on June 19.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.