Project Reset is Allegheny County officials’ effort to give people a fresh start | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Project Reset is Allegheny County officials’ effort to give people a fresh start

Tom Davidson
1507469_web1_ptr-ProjectReset-080719
Tom Davidson | Tribune-Review
Allegheny County Judge Elliot Howsie talks about Project Reset on Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2019, at the Allegheny County Courthouse.

Allegheny County officials are taking a statewide effort to give people who have been charged with or convicted of low-level nonviolent offenses a fresh start to another level.

Called “Project Reset,” the county’s program will help Allegheny County residents learn whether the crimes on their criminal records can be sealed under the state’s Clean Slate law that went into effect June 28. It also will provide guidance for those who are eligible to have their records expunged without having to pay the legal fees involved in doing so, officials said Tuesday.

The effort was headed by Allegheny County Judge Elliot Howsie, who formerly was public defender, and has the support of other county officials, including Executive Rich Fitzgerald, District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., Chief Public Defender Matthew Dugan and Court Records Director Michael McGeever.

Those who have been charged with crimes and found not guilty or had the charges withdrawn still faced the stigma of having those charges on their records, Howsie said.

The process to expunge records can be costly and complicated, he said.

People can take an online quiz to find out whether they’re eligible to have their records expunged.

Since the program’s July 1 inception, the Public Defender’s Office has filed 13 expungement motions, and they’re working to file six more, according to a county news release.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.