Protesters say Paulson Spray Park opening a ‘political stunt’ | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Protesters say Paulson Spray Park opening a ‘political stunt’

Stephen Huba
1179628_web1_ptr-publicartpaulson01-041819
SC Photo
Will Schlough, a graduate of Carnegie Mellon University and an accomplished muralist, created this public art for the new Paulson Spray Park and Playground.

The squeals of delighted children mixed with the shouts of protesters at Saturday’s opening of a new city spray park in Lincoln-Lemington-Belmar.

The Paulson Spray Park and Playground opened at noon Saturday at the site of the former Paulson Swimming Pool, which had been closed for more than a decade.

The new spray park was part of a $1.2 million project that included the installation of piping for water features, improvements to the existing pool house and the addition of a large mural.

But protesters who attended the grand opening accused the city administration, including Mayor Bill Peduto and District 9 Councilman Ricky Burgess, of neglect and political opportunism.

One of them carried a sign that said “Fight Gentrification With Revolution.”

Protesters told Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV that the neighborhood has been neglected and that the spray park opening was moved up only because of Tuesday’s municipal primary elections.

“It’s just a political stunt that’s being hosted by the city,” said Kierran Young, 26, of Stanton Heights, who is running against Burgess in Tuesday’s primary.

Peduto did not comment on the substance of the protesters’ complaints but said, “It’s what makes this country great. Dissent is democracy, and everybody has that right to be able to speak their mind. Their word was heard.”

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.