PWSA issues boil-water advisory for Pittsburgh’s Ridgemont, Westwood and Elliott sections | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

PWSA issues boil-water advisory for Pittsburgh’s Ridgemont, Westwood and Elliott sections

Joe Napsha
1801860_web1_ptr-Pghboilwater-101419
Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority

Pittsburgh residents of the Ridgemont, Westwood and Elliott neighborhoods are being advised Sunday to continue to flush their water systems and boil their water because of a water main break in Mt. Washington, the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority said.

The boil water advisory for about 870 residences remains in effect until the authority completes two rounds of tests on the water, Rebecca Zito, authority spokeswoman, said Sunday morning.

The first round is to be conducted Sunday morning, with the second round of testing to be done 24 hours later, Zito said. The water is tested to determine if there is adequate disinfectant levels and to verify that the water is safe to consume.

Residents in the impacted area should run water for at least one minute and then boil it for at least one minute before using it for consumption.

The problem occurred because a 16-inch water main ruptured along Virginia Avenue at 3:30 p.m. Saturday. That resulted in low pressure or no pressure at all for some authority customers in that area, Zito said. When there is a loss of pressure, contaminants can enter the drinking water.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.