Region can’t afford to pass on $1.1B Pittsburgh airport plan, officials say |

Region can’t afford to pass on $1.1B Pittsburgh airport plan, officials say

Tom Davidson
Travelers make their way through the Pittsburgh International Airport.
At the Pittsburgh International Airport, Friday, Jan. 22, 2016, a family arrives hoping to travel this weekend. By early Friday afternoon, flights to Baltimore, Philadelphia, Charlotte, and Washington D.C. were being cancelled due to the coming weather.
Pre-trip anxiety is a reality of modern-day travel, but there are strategies for coping. Here, passengers go through security at Pittsburgh International Airport on May 24, 2016.
A rendering of the redesigned Pittsburgh International Airport.
Allegheny County Airport Authority CEO Christina Cassotis

Allegheny County’s aviation chief says the authority she runs has no choice but to spend at least $1.1 billion to overhaul Pittsburgh International Airport less than 30 years after it opened as a hub for the former US Airways.

Changes in the airline industry, local air service and the region’s economy warrant the investment, and mounting maintenance costs make it prudent, according to Allegheny County Airport Authority CEO Christina Cassotis.

“The most practical and pragmatic thing to do is to keep what works well and start over with the rest,” Cassotis said.

“There is no do-nothing” option, Cassotis said.

Evolving needs

Construction expected to get under way this year includes building a new landside terminal that’s connected to the existing airside terminal where passengers board planes.

The new terminal will be the first major overhaul of Pittsburgh International Airport since it opened in 1992. It replaced Greater Pittsburgh International Airport, which had been the region’s airport since 1952.

The existing four-story landside terminal includes ticketing and baggage areas and security checkpoints. It sits a 70-second train ride away from the X-shaped airside terminal in the middle of the airfield.

The airside terminal retains a “wow” factor even now. Connecting a new landside terminal to it makes sense now that the airport is no longer a hub catering to passengers transferring to connecting flights, many of whom never set foot inside the landside terminal, said Mike Boyd, president of Boyd Group International, a Colorado-based aviation consulting firm.

Pittsburgh lost its hub status in 2004 as US Airways was in financial turmoil. In the 15 years since, the airport has transitioned from being a hub to an origin-and-destination airport where most passengers are traveling to or from the Pittsburgh region rather than catching connecting flights here.

Bijan Vasigh, a professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Fla., said the project also makes sense from a customer-service standpoint.

Designs unveiled this year aim to shorten walking distances for passengers and speed up flow through security areas.

“The service level is one of the most important things,” he said. “Passengers are choosing an airport.”

More passengers have been choosing Pittsburgh in recent years, thanks to increased flights and destinations. The airport had 9.66 million passengers in 2018, up from 7.99 million in 2014, according to the authority. That’s an increase of 21%.

Fewer moving parts

Losing its hub status didn’t just force Pittsburgh to change the nature of its air service.

During that difficult transitional period, the airport had to focus most of its resources on “keeping the lights on,” according to Paul Hoback, the authority’s senior vice president for engineering, planning and capital development.

That meant postponing most improvement projects and maintenance of the facility, something that put airport officials in the quandary that ultimately guided the decision to move forward with plans to build a new terminal.

“There’s a cost to that,” Cassotis said of making the upgrades necessary to the landside terminal. They would include rehabbing the 8 miles of belts that transport luggage on two systems between the terminals, continual maintenance of the trains that transport people between them and other regular work a building that’s more than 25 years old needs.

When officials announced the project in 2017, they said it would reduce operating and maintenance costs by an estimated $23 million a year.

The new configuration will make the airport more cost-efficient in the long term, Boyd said, and will result in fewer moving parts like the miles of belts and trains that transport luggage and passengers between the terminals.

First impressions

The investment also is intended to help the region put its best foot forward and reflect an economy that has changed dramatically since the current airport was built, officials said.

The airport is the “front door” to the region for those flying here, and improving the first impression people get when that land here is important to marketing the region, said Allegheny Conference on Community Development CEO Stefani Pashman.

“We need to make sure the airport, itself, is emblematic of today’s Pittsburgh,” Pashman said. “To make people get a message that Pittsburgh is on the map and Pittsburgh is a world-class city.”

Something to prove

By the time it’s expected to be finished in 2023, the project could exceed the $1.1 billion that it’s now projected to cost.

That’s more than the combined cost to build Pittsburgh’s sports facilities, Heinz Field ($281 million), PNC Park ($216 million) and PPG Paints Arena ($321 million).

The only project larger in scope and cost is Royal Dutch Shell’s multibillion cracker plant under construction in Beaver County, which is expected to be completed as the improvements begin to take shape at the airport.

Bond money would be used to finance most of the project costs. Unlike heavily taxpayer-funded stadium projects, the authority would rely on revenues derived from sources such as airport parking, concessions, retail sales and airline fees to cover debt payments.

It is expected to be a boon for building trades in the region, according to Jeff Nobers, executive director of the Builders Guild of Western Pennsylvania.

“We’re really looking to continue to build the workforce,” Nobers said. “We feel we’re in a good place.”

Big projects like the airport, cracker plant and several hospitals that are planned in the coming years mean that those in the building trades don’t have to look far for work, and more people are needed, Nobers said.

The project is anticipated to require 10,000 workers over four years of construction, Cassotis said.

“We’re doing the project because we have to. It’s time,” Cassotis said. “We are going to prove to the airlines that a medium-sized community in the center of the country that got dehubbed and left flat on its back can, in fact, come back and offer stable and predictable airline costs in a brand-new building. That’s what we’re doing here.”

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.