Reputed Penn Hills gang member gets federal prison for gun charge |

Reputed Penn Hills gang member gets federal prison for gun charge

Chuck Biedka

A reputed Penn Hills gang member was ordered to spend more than five years in federal prison for having a gun when he was selling illicit drugs, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Pittsburgh.

Jaamiyl Dean, age 43, of the 100 block of Quail Drive, was sentenced Friday morning in federal district court by Senior United States District Judge Reggie B. Walton. He had pleaded guilty in July.

Prosecutors told the court that Dean was heard in FBI and federal Drug Enforcement Administration wiretaps investigating violence committed by the Greenway Boy Killas (GBK) street gang and drug trafficking. The crimes occurred in and around the Mountainview and Crafton Heights housing developments in an area of the West End known as the Greenway projects.

The gang is accused of shootings in Pittsburgh’s West End, Homestead and Munhall.

According to court records, a June 20, 2018 search of Dean’s home and car uncovered guns, ammunition, drug packaging and $64,000 in cash. Dean is a convicted felon who can’t legally have guns or ammunition.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tonya Sulia Goodman and Yvonne M. Saadi prosecuted the case.

U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady commended the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration, who jointly led the investigation, which also included the state Attorney General’s Office, the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office, state police, Robinson Township, Stowe Township, Wilkinsburg and McKees Rocks police departments.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.