ShareThis Page
Retired cop on Garfield skeleton discovery: ‘This is the end of the story.’ |

Retired cop on Garfield skeleton discovery: ‘This is the end of the story.’

Bob Bauder
Contractors found the bones of a woman while working on a deck in the backyard of this vacant house in Pittsburgh’s Garfield neighborhood on Feb. 28, 2018.

Retired Pittsburgh police Assistant Chief Therese Rocco knew Albert and Mary Arcuri intimately.

She was godmother to their daughter. Her family and the Arcuri’s were neighbors when Rocco lived in the Lower Hill District.

She described the couple as loving parents and great people.

But unsettled details started to add up when she learned last year that a skeleton uncovered by contractors in the backyard of a Garfield house was once owned by the Arcuris.

“I knew immediately. ‘Oh my god, a body at the Arcuri’s house,’” she said. “The first thought that came to my mind was Mary, but I didn’t say that. I could have been wrong.”

Pittsburgh police on Thursday announced that DNA testing confirmed the bones were those of Mary Arcuri, who disappeared in 1964.

Her husband told family members that she took her clothes and personal items and left him. Rumors circulated that she was having an affair and the story seemed plausible, Rocco said.

She said Albert Arcuri was a nice guy, not someone who would be prone to violence.

She couldn’t believe he would hurt his wife, but she always wondered why Mary Arcuri never contacted her children or family members after her disappearance.

It seemed doubly strange, she said, that Albert Arcuri died less than a year later after ramming his car at a high speed into a brick wall at the former Don Allen Chevrolet car dealership on Baum Boulevard. She said police believed it was a suicide after determining that Arcuri could have averted the crash.

Rocco was unaware that the Arcuris lived in Garfield until detectives showed up at her door last year with questions about the skeleton. The couple bought the house on Black Street in February 1960 for $9,700, according to Allegheny County real estate records. It was sold at sheriff’s sale in 1966.

Contractors discovered the remains under a concrete slab and bricks in February 2018 while renovating the house, which has exchanged hands several times since the Arcuris owned it.

Investigators thought the bones were those of another missing woman.

Rocco, who formerly headed the police Missing Persons Bureau and stores files from unsolved cases in her basement, gave them dental records of the woman in question. It wasn’t her.

Detectives later returned with that news and another piece of the puzzle: The house had been owned by her former neighbors.

“I believe she might have told him she was going to leave him, I don’t know,” Rocco said. “They might have had an argument and the argument ensued into a physical altercation. She was so tiny that one little push….”

Police are continuing to investigate. The Allegheny Medical Examiner’s Office has listed the cause and manner of death as undetermined.

Rocco doesn’t think police will ever conclusively determine how Mary Arcuri died.

“This is the end of the story,” she said. “There’s just nobody left.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.