Police: Robbery leading to Penn Hills shootings was similar to past crime | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Police: Robbery leading to Penn Hills shootings was similar to past crime

Dillon Carr
1417997_web1_ptr-PHshootingfolo02-071619
Onaje Dickinson in July 2018.

The suspect in a weekend robbery turned homicide that police say led to him being shot and killed by a Penn Hills officer used a similar tactic to rob a woman in Pittsburgh earlier this month, according to a criminal complaint filed against him.

Onaje Dickinson, 20, of Pittsburgh was shot and killed by a Penn Hills police officer Sunday after police said he shot at and charged the officer in a basement where he was hiding.

Police were searching for Dickinson because they believed he was involved in robbery that left one man dead on Sharon Court across the street.

Myzle Ford, 15, has been described as an accomplice in the Sharon Court robbery and homicide and was charged Monday as an adult with homicide and other related charges. Details about the Sharon Court robbery mimicked details provided by police about a July 5 robbery in which Dickinson was a suspect.

On July 5, Dickinson allegedly used an unidentified man’s cell phone to lure a woman behind the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh in Knoxville to buy marijuana. When she went to meet that man she thought was selling her marijuana, Dickinson approached her, according to the complaint.

As Dickinson approached, he took a black revolver from his waistband and pointed it at her head, the woman told police. Dickinson told the woman to give her everything she had, police wrote in the complaint. The woman said she gave him her purse, which contained $300 in cash, a debit card and her ID.

Police eventually identified Dickinson because officers “have dealt with him in the past,” according to the criminal complaint. Dickinson was charged with robbery, simple assault and theft by unlawful taking, and police obtained an arrest warrant because it was unknown where he was staying.

Ford described to police a similar tactic used by Dickinson in a planned robbery that left Joshua A. Makhanda-Lopez, 30, of Mt. Oliver dead in the driver’s seat of a Chevrolet Impala, according to the criminal complaint filed against Ford.

Prior to the shooting Sunday on Sharon Court, Ford told police Dickinson, also known as “JB,” was staying at his mom’s house on Frankstown Road for the last couple days.

The teen said Dickinson gave him a handgun and recruited him to help with the robbery that Makhanda-Lopez believed was a marijuana deal. Dickinson then used Ford’s cellphone and communicated with Makhana-Lopez “to lure him to the scene on Sharon Court,” the complaint said.

Ford told police he did not shoot Makhanda-Lopez and that he gave Dickinson his handgun back after the shooting.

Ford faces robbery, conspiracy, homicide and weapons violations and is scheduled for a preliminary hearing in Downtown Pittsburgh on July 24.

The Penn Hills police officer that shot and killed Dickinson has not been identified and remains on paid administrative leave. The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office has not yet issued a ruling on the shooting.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.