Michael Rosfeld, East Pittsburgh deny liability for death of Antwon Rose | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Michael Rosfeld, East Pittsburgh deny liability for death of Antwon Rose

1340625_web1_MRosfeldD-031319
AP
Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld was acquitted March 22 on homicide charges in the shooting death of Antwon Rose II as he ran from a felony traffic stop.
1340625_web1_ptr-roselawsuit-080318
Antwon Rose II

Attorneys for East Pittsburgh and its former police officer, Michael Rosfeld, denied any wrongdoing in the death of Antwon Rose II, contending in court filings that Rose caused his own death by way of his actions.

Rose’s death was “caused by his own willful, malicious and criminal misconduct,” attorneys for the borough wrote in a response to a wrongful death lawsuit filed by Rose’s estate last year.

According to the borough’s response, it was Rose’s “negligence, carelessness and reckless disregard for the rights of others” that left the teen dead, not any civil rights violations as the lawsuit has alleged.

Responses from attorneys for Rosfeld and the borough were filed Tuesday.

Rosfeld, who in March was acquitted of homicide, shot and killed Rose, 17, on June 19, 2018, as he ran from a felony traffic stop on Grandview Avenue in East Pittsburgh. Rosfeld stopped the gold Chevy Cruze because it matched the description of a car involved in a drive-by shooting minutes earlier in nearby North Braddock. Rosfeld ordered the driver out of the car, and Rose and another teenage passenger ran. Rosfeld opened fire.

The family’s lawsuit alleged that Rosfeld’s commands were aggressive and hostile, and it contends that as Rose got out of the car, he briefly raised his hands. Rosfeld’s attorneys denied such allegations in their response, arguing that Rose “flung open the front passenger door” and did not show his hands. They also denied the allegation that Rosfeld had his weapon trained on Rose at the time.

Rosfeld opened fire, attorneys said, because Rose “extended his arm toward (Rosfeld) in a manner that caused (Rosfeld) to reasonably perceive that he was pointing a weapon at him,” according to the court filing.

The Rose family’s lawsuit seeks a jury trial and demands compensation for, among other things, “loss of income both past and future income potential.”

Attorneys for both Rosfeld and the borough noted that Rose would not have provided any support to his family if he’d survived “to the extent that he would have been convicted and incarcerated” for his alleged role in the drive-by that preceded his death.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.