Jury for Michael Rosfeld, charged in killing of Antwon Rose, to come from Dauphin County | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Jury for Michael Rosfeld, charged in killing of Antwon Rose, to come from Dauphin County

Megan Guza
663750_web1_Michael-Rosfeld1
Michael Rosfeld

A jury will be chosen from Dauphin County in the homicide case against former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld, charged in the 2018 killing of Antwon Rose II, the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office said Tuesday.

The DA’s office tweeted Tuesday that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered that Dauphin County would provide the jury.

Patrick Thomassey, defense counsel for Rosfeld, had argued from the beginning that no local jury could fairly decide the case, which has gained national attention. Prosecutors argued that the trial was being unnecessarily ripped from local residents.

Common Pleas Judge Alex Bicket ruled in Thomassey’s favor last week, approving his motion for a change of venire. Thomassey had filed motions for both a change of venue, when the trial is moved elsewhere, and change of venire, when a jury is brought in from elsewhere.

Rosfeld faces one count of homicide in the June 19 shooting. His trial is scheduled to begin Feb 26. It is not yet clear when jury selection will take place. Court documents related to the state supreme court’s decision were not immediately available.

Bicket wrote in his Jan. 14 opinion that the outside jury could help the prosecution, saying that “the multitude of protests in the streets of Downtown Pittsburgh and elsewhere in Allegheny County may be a basis for potential juror bias that would and should concern the Commonwealth and its case as well.”

The judge also cited a poll of potential jurors he conducted over three days in December. Bicket asked those who showed up for jury duty whether they had heard, seen or read coverage of the case. Bicket said that out of 224 potential jurors polled, 81 percent said they were aware of the shooting.

Of those who had heard of the case, 40 percent said they had a fixed opinion. About half of those with a fixed opinion said they could set their feelings aside and fairly consider the evidence.

The jury for the trial of Richard Poplawski, convicted of killing three Pittsburgh police officers in 2009, was also chosen from Dauphin County.

Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey A. Manning said in that instance that intense pretrial publicity likely tainted the Allegheny County jury pool, saying at the time, “In light of the pervasive and prejudicial pretrial publicity, the defense motion is granted to the extent of a change of venire.”

That selection took place over several days in early June 2011.

Rose was a passenger in a car suspected in a drive-by shooting in North Braddock minutes before the deadly shooting in East Pittsburgh. As Rosfeld ordered the driver to the ground, Rose and backseat passenger, Zaijuan Hester, ran from the car. Rosfeld opened fire, authorities said.

The homicide charge was filed a week later.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.