Judge to allow testimony about drive-by shooting in Michael Rosfeld trial | TribLIVE.com

Judge to allow testimony about drive-by shooting in Michael Rosfeld trial

Megan Guza
Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld, charged with homicide in the shooting death of Antwon Rose II, arrives at the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg on Tuesday, March 12, 2019.

Testimony about a drive-by shooting that preceded the shooting death of Antwon Rose will be permitted during the homicide trial of Michael Rosfeld, the former police officer who killed Rose, a judge ruled Monday.

However, Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Alexander Bicket said details of a robbery in which defense attorney Patrick Thomassey says Rose was involved will not be allowed unless the judge says otherwise.

Rosfeld is scheduled to go on trial beginning Tuesday morning.

Chief Trial Deputy District Attorney Daniel Fitzsimmons argued Monday against allowing Thomassey to include details of Rose’s alleged involvement in the robbery.

Thomassey argued the evidence of Rose’s alleged involvement is necessary because “it’s the complete story.” He wrote in court documents that such evidence would support Rosfeld’s belief that “one of the occupants who exited the vehicle … pointed a gun at him.”

Fitzsimmons said the prosecution intends to address the two firearms found in the vehicle in which Rose was a passenger. One of the firearms contained the DNA of backseat passenger Zaijuan Hester, who pleaded guilty to the North Braddock drive-by shooting that led to Rosfeld’s traffic stop in East Pittsburgh. The other had Rose’s DNA on it.

Rose, a black 17-year-old, ran from the felony traffic stop. Rosfeld, who was newly sworn in to the borough’s police force, is white. Rosfeld shot Rose three times, killing him. Authorities later said Rose was unarmed.

Thomassey indicated he will argue that a clip found in Rose’s pocket after his death matched the gun that contained Hester’s DNA.

Rosfeld stopped the car Rose was a passenger in because it matched the description of one involved in a drive-by minutes earlier.

Thomassey previously said he wants the jury of six men and six women to weigh only one charge: first-degree murder. Bicket said Monday he will decide as the trial plays out.

“I disagree with Mr. Thomassey,” Bicket said, “but that doesn’t mean he won’t make a compelling argument to change my mind. That doesn’t mean he will, either.”

Rosfeld is charged with one count of homicide. Prosecutors want the jury to consider third-degree murder and voluntary and involuntary manslaughter.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.