Ross cops seek man accused of firing on ex and her new boyfriend |

Ross cops seek man accused of firing on ex and her new boyfriend

Tony LaRussa
Ross Township police are seeking the public’s help locating Clinton Wesley Lance, 28, of Braddock. Investigators say Lance threatened to shoot his ex-girlfriend after she obtained a protection from abuse order against him.

Ross Township police are seeking the public’s help locating a man wanted for allegedly firing a gun at his former girlfriend and her new boyfriend as she drove to work.

An arrest warrant was issued Thursday for Clinton Wesley Lance, 28, of Braddock, who is accused of harassing and threatening the woman after she obtained a protection from abuse order against him, according to Ross police.

Lance is accused of sending his girlfriend harassing and threatening text messages Sept. 25 and using the Facetime video calling app to show her a gun. Police say Lance threatened to find the woman, whose name was not released, at work and shoot her.

Investigators say Lance then parked his car in a dark area near the health-care facility where the woman worked and fired six shots as she and her boyfriend drove past.

The couple told authorities that they recognized Lance’s vehicle and saw the muzzle flashes as he fired. No other employees were near the facility when the shots were fired and there were no injuries reported.

Lance has been charged with two counts each of making terroristic threats, simple assault, reckless endangerment and harassment.

Anyone with information that can lead police to his arrest is asked to call 911.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.