Ross man accused of soliciting sex from a minor |

Ross man accused of soliciting sex from a minor

Madasyn Czebiniak

A Ross man is accused of soliciting sex from an undercover agent posing as a teenager.

U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said Thomas Perry Stultz, 36, was indicted this week by a federal grand jury on a charge of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity.

According to the affidavit filed in the case, Stultz used the app Grindr and his cellphone to persuade the agent, posing as a 14-year-old boy, to engage in sexual activity from Feb. 6 until April 5.

Stultz knew the agent was 14 when he engaged in sexually explicit conversations with him and requested to meet him, according to the affidavit. He allegedly replied “nice” when the agent told Stultz his age.

Stultz sent the agent sexually explicit pictures of himself and asked the agent to send pictures. The agent sent Stultz pictures of other officers when they were 14, which Stultz expressed appreciation for, the affidavit said.

On April 5, Stultz and the agent made plans to meet in person at the T stop at the North Shore next to Heinz Field. As Stultz made his way to the meeting point, he texted the agent, “I’m also a little nervous being that your so young lol,” the affidavit said.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.