Ross manager resigns for ‘personal reasons’ | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Ross manager resigns for ‘personal reasons’

Tony LaRussa
1627593_web1_WEB-ross-township-municipal-center

Ross commissioners voted unanimously Tuesday night to accept the resignation of manager Douglas Sample.

Board President Steve Korbel said Sample, whose last day on the job was Friday, resigned “for personal reasons.”

“He didn’t resign because of any township-related malfeasance,” Korbel said following the Sept. 3 meeting.

The vote also included a separation agreement for a severance package that was part of Sample’s contract.

Sample was hired as Ross manager in December 2012.

His salary this year was $110,892, according to the township budget.

Sample’s position is being filled on an interim basis by Richard Hadley, chairman of the board of supervisors in Cranberry Township.

Hadley previously worked as the manager for Reserve Township and is a retired executive director of the Allegheny League of Municipalities.

Commissioners approved an agreement Aug. 19 to hire Hadley at a contracted rate of $80 an hour.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.