Ross Police charge former Lyft driver in 2-year-old rape case |

Ross Police charge former Lyft driver in 2-year-old rape case

Jamie Martines
Ross Police Department
Darrel Eugene Hardy, Jr.

Ross police charged a former Lyft driver Friday with rape in connection with a suspected incident involving two women in a McKnight Road hotel room.

Darrel Eugene Hardy, Jr., 30, was working as a Lyft driver July 1, 2017, when he drove two female passengers to the Hampton Inn Hotel on McKnight Road, police said in a statement.

Hardy allegedly followed the women to their room, police said. He was not invited, but they did allow him to enter the room, where he appeared to fall asleep in a chair, police said. The Ross Police Department did not disclose further details about what happened.

Hardy did not show up for an interview with Ross Police following the incident, and they later realized he left the country, the statement said.

By September 2018, Ross Police learned that Hardy was being held at Allegheny County Jail on unrelated charges. They were then able to obtain a search warrant for Hardy’s DNA, which matched a sample recovered from the victim after the 2017 assault, police said.

Hardy was charged with rape, sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault and indecent assault.

He is still lodged at Allegheny County Jail on charges in an unrelated homicide case in North Versailles.

Hardy is facing arson-related charges, along with homicide, carrying a firearm without a license and tampering with evidence. A jury trial is scheduled for Sept. 16.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.