Second elderly Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to cocaine trafficking |

Second elderly Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to cocaine trafficking

Chuck Biedka
Tribune-Review file photo
U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh

An elderly Pittsburgh man pleaded guilty in federal court on Monday to trafficking in cocaine and money laundering for more than 20 years.

Richard Stuart Wright, 76, entered the guilty plea to three counts before United States District Judge Mark R. Hornak.

He will be allowed to remain at home on a monitor pending sentencing in July because of his ill health, the U.S. Attorney’s office said in a statement Monday.

Wright and co-defendant Walter John Amman, III, 69, not only purchased large amounts of powdered and crack cocaine, the government contends, they also sold the drugs at street level to cut out any mid-level dealers.

On Feb. 14 Amman pleaded guilty to two counts of drug trafficking.

Both men consistently packaged drugs using a color-coded bread-tie system to signify the quantities in the baggies, according to U.S. Attorney Scott Brady.

Police and agents said, over the years, the two sold almost 13 pounds — some 5,900 grams — of powered cocaine and 8 pounds, or 289.6 grams, of crack pieces.

The U.S. Attorney’s office said in a statement Monday that Wright “admitted to all of the drugs, while Amman agreed that he was personally responsible for between 700 grams and one kilogram of cocaine, as well as the 5.767 grams of crack cocaine found at his property.”

The Drug Enforcement Administration made controlled buys of cocaine from Amman before the men were charged.

According to the DEA, when Wright’s garage was searched on Jan. 11, 2017, agents found prepackaged cocaine, multiple firearms and thousands rounds of ammunition along with large amounts of cash.

Investigators say a search warrant served at Amman’s residence the same day turned up firearms and prepackaged crack and cocaine.

The DEA was assisted by the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Branch, Homeland Security Investigations and Pittsburgh Police

The court was also told that Wright and others laundered his drug money.

“In one example, Wright deposited $10,000 in cash into another person’s account, added it to $40,000 of that person’s ‘legitimate’ money and used it to make a $50,000 deposit on a Daytona Beach house,” prosecutors said.

The two also are accused of buying $100,000 worth of postal money orders at $1,000 each and using them to pay the monthly amount due on the property.

Hornak scheduled Wright’s sentencing for July 18 and Amman’s sentencing was scheduled for June 7.

The men each could face up to 60 years in prison, and fines of up to $2.5 million, or both.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.