Subscribe Place Ad Buy Trib Photos Readers' Choice Contests
Jobs Homes Autos Classifieds
Trib Total Media Contact Us
Sex abuse allegation against deceased Pittsburgh Central Catholic teacher | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Sex abuse allegation against deceased Pittsburgh Central Catholic teacher

Megan Guza
Megan Guza
724540_web1_1ptr-CathArt-081018
A man walks past the Diocese of Pittsburgh offices Downtown on Aug. 9, 2018.

A new abuse accusation has surfaced in the ongoing scandal involving the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, the latest involving a priest who died in 2004.

The allegation against the Rev. John O’Brien dates back to the mid-1960s, according to an alert from the diocese. At the time, O’Brien was a Christian Brother teaching at Central Catholic High School under the religious name Brother Firmilian John, FSC.

Diocese officials said this is the first allegation the diocese of Christian Brothers have received against O’Brien. He was ordained as a priest of the diocese in 1975.

The alert indicated that alumni of Central Catholic and those from the parishes where O’Brien served are being notified of the allegation, which has also been reported to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

In August, a statewide grand jury report cited rampant child sex abuse by clergy members and cover-ups by church officials stretching back decades in diocese across Pennsylvania. The report named 99 priests in the Pittsburgh diocese and 20 in the Diocese of Greensburg.

A full list of O’Brien’s assignments in the diocese was not immediately available.

Victims may report abuse to the state abuse hotline set up following the grand jury report at 1-800-932-0313. They can also contact the Diocesan Assistance Coordinator at 1-888-808-1235.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.