Sex offender and girlfriend arrested in Munhall | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Sex offender and girlfriend arrested in Munhall

Paul Guggenheimer
1105008_web1_ptr-sexoffenderarrest-050219
Roger Coyne

A Homestead man convicted of sexual assault of young children has been apprehended by Allegheny County Sheriff’s deputies, along with his girlfriend, police said.

Roger Coyne, 35, has been wanted since April 15, 2019, on a probation/parole violation as a result of two 2016 convictions involving the physical and sexual assault of young children.

Coyne was arrested at the Munhall apartment of his girlfriend Letitia Stark, 36, police said. Stark was taken into custody and charged with three counts of conduct relating to sex offenders as she is accused of harboring Coyne. Last month, a warrant was issued for Coyne’s arrest when police said he failed to appear for a scheduled hearing.

In 2016, Coyne was found guilty of indecent assault of a person under 13 years of age, endangering the welfare of children and corruptions of minors, as well as aggravated assault and endangering the welfare of children, respective to each case.

As part of his sentencing, Coyne is identified as a Tier 3 offender, which requires him to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Both Coyne and Stark are being held at Allegheny County Jail. Coyne is being is being held without bond. Additionally, he is being charged with failure to register as a sex offender.

Stark is awaiting arraignment on her new charges.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.