Police: Shaler man charged after trying to arrange trysts with boys in library restroom | TribLIVE.com

Police: Shaler man charged after trying to arrange trysts with boys in library restroom

Tom Davidson
Shaler Police Department
Nicholas Cukanow

An 18-year-old Shaler man is facing felony charges after police allege he placed an online ad seeking boys to have sex with at the Shaler North Hills Library restroom.

Shaler police and FBI agents arrested Nicholas J. Cukanow on Thursday at Kiwanis Park, near the Shaler library.

He was expecting an introductory meeting with a 12-year-old boy who had replied to his online ad, according to a criminal complaint filed against him. Instead, Cukanow had been communicating with an undercover agent working for the FBI’s Violent Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The investigation into Cukanow started June 13 when someone at the Shaler North Hills Library called police to report a person posting online ads looking for men of any age to have sex with, according to the complaint.

An undercover agent replied to the ad posing as a 12-year-old boy. A man later identified as Cukanow responded, police said.

The two exchanged messages and decided on an initial meeting Thursday at the park. Cukanow was arrested when he arrived. After his arrest, police found on him a cellphone with a number that matched the number involved in the conversations with the agent, according to the complaint.

Cukanow is charged with unlawful contact with a minor, four counts of attempted involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a child and criminal use of a cellphone.

He was released after posting $50,000 bail. No attorney was listed for Cukanow in court documents.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.