ShareThis Page
Hays bald eagles lay 2nd egg in Pittsburgh nest |

Hays bald eagles lay 2nd egg in Pittsburgh nest

Mary Ann Thomas
Courtesy of CSE and Audubon Society of Western Pa.
The Pittsburgh Hays bald eagles laid their second egg of the season on Friday, Feb. 15, 2019.

The bald eagles in Pittsburgh’s Hays neighborhood laid their second egg of the season at their nest Friday.

The Hays eagles, in their seventh season, generally lay two to three eggs in their nest overlooking the Monongahela River and the Pittsburgh skyline.

The Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania, which operates a live webcam with CSE Corp. on the Hays nest, documents the eagles, which are the first pair to nest in Pittsburgh city limits in more than 150 years.

The first egg was laid on Tuesday.

Both eagles will take turns incubating the eggs, which are expected to hatch in 35 days in the order they were laid. The birds typically lay one to three eggs, two to four days apart.

The birds sometimes lay eggs that don’t hatch.

Since they began nesting in Hays, the eagles have produced at least one eaglet each season. They produced one eaglet in 2013, ‘17 and ‘18; two in 2016; three in 2014; and none in 2015.

In Allegheny County, other eagle nests are located in Harmar, Crescent Township, the McKeesport area and North Park.

Another nest has been suspected but not found for a pair of eagles frequenting the Allegheny River near Harrison Hills Park in Harrison .

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.