Sidewalk delivery robots coming to Pitt this fall |

Sidewalk delivery robots coming to Pitt this fall

Kristina Serafini | Tribune-Review
People wheel items up a ramp to the Schenley Quad student dorms on move-in day for first-year students at the University of Pittsburgh in Oakland on Monday, Aug. 19, 2019.
Photo courtesy of Starship Technologies
Starship Technologies and University of Pittsburgh plan to deploy a fleet of autonomous delivery robots in Oakland to deliver to students.
Associated Press
The Cathedral of Learning on the University of Pittsburgh campus in Oakland

The sidewalks in Oakland may soon be getting even more crowded.

The University of Pittsburgh and Starship Technologies, a robotics company that makes 50-pound robots resembling coolers on wheels, plan to launch a delivery service this year.

“We are working with the city and our Oakland neighbors toward a launch later this fall,” Pitt spokesman Kevin Zwick said in an email.

A fleet of about 25 robots will be programmed to travel on Pitt’s campus carrying groceries, take-out meals and packages.

The Oakland Planning and Development Corporation discussed bringing automated delivery robots to the neighborhood during an August meeting. David Catania, Starship’s head of government affairs, reported then that the robots would operate in a similar manner to other universities.

OPDC has not taken a position on the proposal.

Starship, which was founded in Estonia and San Francisco, has already tested out its meal carriers in Estonia, London, and Washington, D.C.

In 2016, the company had test runs at the University of Arkansas — its first test on a college campus. Starship brought 25 delivery robots to George Mason University in January and brought robots to Northern Arizona University in March.

The latest ventures involved a partnership between Starship and Sodexo Inc., a food management company that also serves the University of Pittsburgh. Starship mentioned Pitt in a news release detailing their plans to expand to more colleges after securing $40 million in funding earlier this year.

The plan is to have the robots operate on campus first, while negotiating with Pittsburgh on how to expand. Catania said Forbes Street Market could be one of the early on-campus vendors. He said the robots would not deliver alcohol.

The service would cost a flat fee of $1.99 per delivery, with customers meeting the robot at a designated location and obtaining their items by accessing a mobile app on their phones upon delivery.

Starship said their robots operate autonomously up to 99% of the time. The other 1% accounts for technical difficulties and other interference. But just in case, they may be controlled by a remote human operator at any time.

Delivery robots are on the rise. According to a study by Markets and Markets, the delivery robots market is expected to grow from nearly $12 million in 2018 to $34 million by 2024.

Starship launched in 2014 and has been one of the robotics companies testing these types of robots the longest.

Pitt may have to overcome obstacles that other cities have faced concerning where and how sidewalk robots operate. In 2017, San Francisco municipal legislators attempted to ban delivery robots shortly after they first appeared. Instead of an outright ban, the legislators succeeded in restricting access and operation of delivery robots, effectively banning them from much of the city barring a specific permit. One restriction included capping the number of robots in the city to a total of nine. Just this year, Postmates attained a permit to test its new delivery robots in a limited area of the city.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.