Some charges dropped against former Canon-Mac wrestler shot by police |

Some charges dropped against former Canon-Mac wrestler shot by police

Paul Guggenheimer
Logan B. Macri won a state wrestling championship in 2018 while at Canon-McMillan High School.

Some charges against a former Canon-McMillan wrestler have been dropped, but the most serious accusations that he pointed a gun at police who shot him four times remain.

Logan Macri, who won the state championship in 2018, is recovering as his case winds its way through the Washington County courts, said his attorney, Casey White.

“He’s working on things and progressing daily,” said White. “We have to now determine what caused Logan to act in the way he did. And hopefully during the course of this case, we can provide answers as to what was really going through Logan in the moments leading up to the interaction with law enforcement.”

Macri, 20, will stand trial on charges including aggravated assault, simple assault and terroristic threats. Three other charges Macri faced for allegedly attacking his mother were withdrawn June 10.

“She was never a victim,” said White. “Her injuries were minor. She was trying to deescalate the situation.”

Macri’s mother had called police to their home in the 400 block of West McMurray Road in North Strabane on April 14. Three police officers, two from North Strabane and one from Canonsburg, responded and told Macri to get on the ground. He initially complied with the officers’ commands, put up his hands and got down on his stomach in the driveway according to the police report.

While they were attempting to take him into custody, Macri stood up and pointed an AR-15 rifle at the approaching police officers, according to the complaint. All three officers fired their weapons.

Officers showed dashcam video to White and Macri at a June 10 preliminary hearing. It was not presented as evidence.

“It provides certainly some clarity as to what happened in the moments leading up to Mr. Macri being shot by law enforcement,” said White. “I think the video actually helps both sides hopefully work towards some sort of amicable agreement because there is really no gray area as to what took place in the moments leading up to the shooting.”

White said Macri’s gun was not loaded. The officers who shot him were cleared and have returned to duty.

“At this point in time we don’t disagree with the Washington County District Attorney’s Office’s position as to the justification for the use of force in this. After reviewing the video, we understand why (the police) acted in the manner that they did,” said White. “That gun was not loaded, but things happened in such a split second that it would have been very difficult for those officers to determine that at that point in time.”

White said Macri was hit four times and had to be flown to a Pittsburgh hospital for surgery. He sustained injuries to his right hand which included shattered bones. Macri appeared in court with a cast on his right arm. He was also shot in his right foot and buttocks.

“He has had surgery on his hand and is recovering and at some point will have 100% usage of his hand. His foot is a lot better and he is able to walk without assistance,” said White.

Macri’s next court date has been scheduled for July 25. In the meantime, Macri is free on $100,000 bond. A court case could potentially begin in the late fall, said White.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.