South Fayette retiree, daughter sue to recover $82K seized at Pittsburgh airport | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

South Fayette retiree, daughter sue to recover $82K seized at Pittsburgh airport

Deb Erdley
2192961_web1_Terry-Rolin
Institute for Justice
Rebecca Brown and her father, Terry Rolin, 79, of South Fayette, have sued the federal government over $82,373 in cash agents seized in August at Pittsburgh International Airport.

A 79-year-old retired railroad engineer and his adult daughter Wednesday sued two federal agencies in an effort to recover more than $82,000 seized last summer inside Pittsburgh International Airport.

Rebecca Brown, 54, of Lowell, Mass., said her father, Terry Rolin, a resident of the South Fayette village of Morgan, had entrusted her with his life savings while she visited home in August for a weekend family wedding.

He asked her to help him manage the $82,373, cash he and his late parents had squirreled away for years in hiding spots throughout the family home, she said.

“It was late Saturday night after the banks closed when he gave me the money, and I had an early (Monday) morning flight home. So, I didn’t get a chance to get to a bank in Pittsburgh,” Brown said. “I was concerned about traveling with cash, so I checked online and found out it was legal to travel domestically with cash. I even took a screenshot of what it said and saved it on my phone.

“I was going to open a joint checking account so he could get some expensive, much-needed dental work done and make repairs to his truck,” Brown said.

She said her father also gave her permission to tap the account to pay $15,000 in back taxes she owed.

Brown, who has two brothers in the Pittsburgh area, said she routinely travels to her father’s home every two months or so. She said he asked for her help after they discovered discrepancies in his bank accounts.

Lawyers from the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit legal group in Washington, D.C., filed the class-action lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh. It maintains agents from the Transportation Security Agency and U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency acted unlawfully when they seized the cash Brown was carrying en route to a flight home.

The suit maintains the agencies routinely seize cash from air passengers carrying anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000 and asked a judge to prohibit agents from seizing cash at airports without specific probable cause.

A DEA spokesman did not immediately respond to a call for comment.

A TSA spokeswoman said the agency does not comment on pending litigation.

In August, Brown said a TSA agent working at a security checkpoint questioned her about the cash, which she was carrying in a small, zippered bag inside a satchel. That agent made her wait to undergo questioning by his supervisor.

After the pair cleared her, Brown said she had breakfast, then walked to the gate and sat down to get some work done while awaiting her flight. While there, Brown said she was approached by a state trooper and a DEA agent, who asked about the money and had her call her father.

“They woke him up at 7 a.m. This is a 79-year-old man who has cognitive issues,” Brown said. “He was confused. The agent said our stories didn’t match up and they were seizing the cash. It was ridiculous, but I was scared. They didn’t charge me with anything, and I’ve never been in trouble.”

Dan Alban, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, said the same thing has happened to others at airports across the nation.

“Flying with any amount of cash is completely legal. But the TSA and the DEA have a policy that if you hit a certain threshold, it’s suspicious. For the DEA, it’s $5,000. For the TSA, we think it’s about $10,000,” Alban said. “If you’re flying internationally and you have more than $10,000, you have to fill out a form. But this was a domestic flight from Pittsburgh to Boston. And you don’t forfeit your rights when you try to board an airplane.”

He said when the DEA sent Brown a civil forfeiture notice in October, informing her they intended to keep the cash, they cited “a broad catchall about seizing anything related to controlled substances.”

“It could be anything from aardvarks to zoo,” Alban said. “There is just no explanation for this.”

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.