South Park man admits to stealing more than $1 million from Upper St. Clair church |

South Park man admits to stealing more than $1 million from Upper St. Clair church

Michael DiVittorio
David Reiter

A South Park man admitted to stealing $1.2 million from an Upper St. Clair church that he and his wife used on vacations, Pittsburgh Pirates tickets and other expenses, Allegheny County authorities say.

David Reiter, 50, a former administrator at Westminster Presbyterian Church, pleaded guilty Wednesday before Allegheny County Judge Jeffrey A. Manning to theft, receiving stolen property, forgery, access device fraud, tampering with records and unlawful use of a computer.

The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office filed the charges in February.

Reiter worked as the church’s administrator since 2001. He hid the thefts through impersonating employees at audit firms and falsifying accounting data, according to investigators. He created a fake employee at an auditing firm that did not do business with the church but who Reiter said was working on the church’s finances.

According to the criminal complaint, the phone number for the fake auditor was actually for a cellphone that Reiter had purchased with church funds. He then pretended to be the auditor when the church’s treasurer called.

His sentencing is set for Jan. 14. Judge Manning ordered Reiter to pay back more than $1.2 million in restitution.

His wife, Connie Reiter, 44, is charged with two felony counts of receiving stolen property. Her trial is scheduled to start in January.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.