Ross cop charged with illegally using department computers |

Ross cop charged with illegally using department computers

Tony LaRussa

A Ross police officer was charged with illegally using department computers to search internal files.

Agents from the state Attorney General’s Office this week charged Officer Mark Sullivan, 39, with two felony counts of unlawful use of a computer.

He was arraigned July 23 before District Judge William Wagner and released on his own recognizance. He faces an Aug. 7 preliminary hearing before Hampton Township District Judge Tom Swan.

Sullivan’s attorney, Charles Porter, was not available Thursday morning for comment.

Sullivan, who was hired in 2011, has been on paid administrative leave since the investigation was launched in January, Ross police said in a statement. Police department officials contacted outside law enforcement agencies to investigate when they learned about the incident, according to the statement.

“Earlier this year, the Ross police department became aware of a situation in which internal files were accessed without the appropriate permissions,” according to the statement. “These were accessed from within the system by an employee.”

Ross police said the incident has not had an impact on public safety.

“The files accessed were internal department-related files,” according to the statement. “There were neither issues in regards to the safety of the public nor any past or ongoing criminal investigations.”

In its statement, Ross police said Sullivan’s “future employment status is currently under administrative action.”

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.