State police to cover midnight shift in Rankin |

State police to cover midnight shift in Rankin

Tom Davidson

A lack of officers spurred Rankin officials to have state police respond to overnight calls in the borough starting Nov. 1.

The department has lost several part-time officers recently who accepted full-time positions elsewhere, and the borough is having a tough time finding replacements, Rankin Mayor M. Nicholas Glova wrote in a letter he read to residents at a council meeting this week.

“The decision was not taken lightly and is very much needed at this time,” Glova wrote in the letter.

The borough’s council approved the measure Tuesday. Glova refused to comment further about the matter.

“Please know that this was not a financial issue, but a lack of manpower issue,” Glova wrote in the letter. “Our chief is having a difficult time filling shifts.”

The elected officials of Rankin have a duty to provide adequate police service and that’s the reason they made the move, he wrote.

Police Chief Ryan Wooten didn’t respond to request for comment. State police deferred comment to Rankin officials about the issue.

The state police took over complete coverage of nearby East Pittsburgh in November.

Rankin supports plans for regional departments in the area to stem this problem, Glova wrote.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.