Stowe man convicted of first-degree murder in elderly man’s beating death | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Stowe man convicted of first-degree murder in elderly man’s beating death

Joe Napsha
1776043_web1_GavelNewN

A Stowe man will spend the rest of his life in prison after being convicted Monday in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court in the 2016 beating death of an elderly McKees Rocks man.

Branden A. Frazier, 28, was convicted by an Allegheny County jury of first-degree murder in the death of Benito Nicoletti, 73, whose body was found in his Vine Street home on June 1, 2016.

The jury deliberated for two hours before convicting Frazier, who underwent a trial before Allegheny County Judge Kevin Sasinoski, according to Michael Manko, a spokesman for Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.

Frazier faces a mandatory life sentence for his conviction on first-degree murder when he is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 3.

Nicoletti was struck multiple times in the head with a blunt object, the Allegheny County Medical Examiner determined. Allegheny County police said they found blood spatter on the walls and ceiling of the room where Nicoletti’s body was found.

Police said they found bloodstained blue jeans inside a backpack belonging to Frazier, and Frazier had used a car that Nicoletti had rented.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.