Study: Pittsburgh No. 1 market for first-time homebuyers |

Study: Pittsburgh No. 1 market for first-time homebuyers

Stephen Huba
Tribune-Review File

Western Pennsylvania first-time homebuyers take heart — Pittsburgh is the best U.S. city based on affordability and several other measures, according to Yahoo Finance.

A survey by said Pittsburgh tops the list of the 10 best major metropolitan areas for first-time homebuyers. The ranking was based on 13 measures related to affordability, culture, housing market tightness, job market and safety.

Raleigh, N.C., Oklahoma City, Okla., Hartford, Conn., and St. Louis, Mo., rounded out the Top 5.

The median home value in the Pittsburgh metro area is $144,400, making the housing market “very hot,” according to Zillow.

Pittsburgh also ranks 15th among the best U.S. cities for jobs, according to Yahoo Finance.

Six of the 10 worst U.S. cities for first-time homebuyers were in California.

Despite the good news for Pittsburgh, a new national survey of 2,000 millennials found that 75% can’t afford to purchase a home.

Some signaled a shifting opinion about the necessity of ownership, but the majority cited financial reasons for their lack of homeownership:

  • 41% are afraid of a burdensome mortgage payment.
  • 76% say student loan or credit card debt is preventing them from buying a home.
  • 65% think they’ll have to relocate to afford a home, and 41% believe it’ll be out of state.
  • Half have less than $2,000 saved for a down payment.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.