Surgeon from Pittsburgh among 8 arrested in Texas online child predator sting |

Surgeon from Pittsburgh among 8 arrested in Texas online child predator sting

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Houston Chronicle
Shawn Paul Robinson

A surgeon from Pittsburgh was among eight people arrested in a crackdown of suspected online sexual predators targeting children.

Shawn Paul Robinson, 38, a resident of Galveston, was working as a surgeon at the University of Texas Medical Branch, according to a new release from Harris County Constable Harry Rosen.

Robinson was in Texas on a fellowship at the University of Texas, according to the release.

He was released after posting $15,000 bond, according to the release.

Robinson didn’t immediately return a message seeking comment.

Robinson was arrested in an operation called “Back to School III,” an undercover effort by the Houston Metro Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force with Harris County Precinct One Constable’s office and the Houston Police Department leading the operation.

The goal of the operation was “to identify and apprehend adults using the internet and social media to sexually exploit children by soliciting sex and/or sex-related acts,” according to the release.

Task force officers posed as minors in various social media apps from late August to early September.

If convicted of felony online solicitation of a minor, Robinson and the others arrested face up to 20 years in prison.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.