Suspect in Carrick double shooting arrested |

Suspect in Carrick double shooting arrested

Jacob Tierney
Pittsburgh Department of Public Safety
Cody Smith Cody Smith, 23, of Pittsburgh, was arrested Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019, on Broadway Avenue in Pittsburgh’s Beechview neighborhood. Smith is charged with shooting two teenagers in Carick on Nov. 14, 2019.

The Allegheny County Fugitive Task Force arrested a man charged with shooting two teenagers in Pittsburgh’s Carrick neighborhood, according to the Pittsburgh Department of Public Safety.

Cody Smith, 23, of Pittsburgh is charged with two counts each of attempted homicide, aggravated assault, robbery and recklessly endangering another person.

Smith allegedly shot two teenagers on Westmont Street on Thursday afternoon. One was shot in the neck, the other in the shoulder. Both were taken to the hospital in stable condition.

Pittsburgh police issued an arrest warrant for Smith on Saturday.

He was apprehended Tuesday on Broadway Avenue in Pittsburgh’s Beechview neighborhood, according police.

He is being held without bail at Allegheny County Jail.

A preliminary hearing in Pittsburgh Municipal Court has been scheduled for Nov. 27.

Another man, Desmond Michael Jones, 20, is charged with robbery and conspiracy as well as and a third suspect who hasn’t been identified yet, according to police. The teens told police that Smith, Jones and the third man followed them in the 2000 block of Dellrose Street in Carrick and told them to empty their pockets.

One of the teens identified Smith as the shooter from a photo lineup, police said. Jones was found sleeping on a couch at Smith’s mother’s home in Carrick as police were looking for Smith, according to a criminal complaint.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.