Suspect arrested in Pittsburgh Fourth of July shooting |

Suspect arrested in Pittsburgh Fourth of July shooting

Michael DiVittorio
Camerin Caldwell

A North Side man wanted in connection with a double shooting on the Fourth of July after a fireworks show in Pittsburgh turned himself in to police Monday, officials said.

Camerin Caldwell, 18, was wanted on firearms violations and two counts each of attempted homicide, aggravated assault and reckless endangerment.

He turned himself in to city police around 4:15 p.m., according to a news release.

The charges against Caldwell stem from a July 4 shooting in which two people were wounded in Downtown’s Agnes R. Katz Plaza.

Pittsburgh police said Caldwell shot an 18-year-old man and 16-year-old boy shortly after 11 p.m. in the 700 block of Penn Avenue.

The man and boy were taken to local hospitals in critical condition in what Pittsburgh police Major Crimes Commander Victor Joseph called a “ridiculous act of senseless violence.”

Police said the 16-year-old suffered a gunshot wound to the head, and the 18-year-old man was shot six times in the body.

Police said the shooting was likely connected to fights earlier that night instigated by music from two opposing groups.

Police said one altercation took place in Point State Park near the end of a fireworks display, and the groups ran into each other again at the plaza later.

Anyone with information about the shooting should contact the city’s Violent Crimes Unit at 412-323-7161.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.