Swissvale man sentenced for threatening judge through mail, assaulting jail guard |

Swissvale man sentenced for threatening judge through mail, assaulting jail guard

Dillon Carr
Nathan Hoye

A Swissvale man was sentenced to 80 to 160 months in prison Tuesday after pleading guilty to two separate cases in which he attacked an Allegheny County Jail guard and sent threatening letters to a judge, officials said.

Nathan Hoye, 26, was serving a 16- to 32-month sentence at the State Correctional Institute at Greene in Waynesburg when he sent up to nine letters to Allegheny County Judge Beth Lazzara between April 2016 and April 2017 that threatened her life.

Lazzara imposed the sentence that landed Hoye in prison and has also handled other cases in which he was the defendant, court records show.

The handwritten letters by Hoye included profane language that threatened to kill Lazzara and her family, according to a criminal complaint.

Investigators matched Hoye’s handwriting with the letters addressed to Lazarra, the criminal complaint said.

For the letters, Hoye was charged with eight counts of making terroristic threats, six counts of harassment, one count of stalking and one count of making threats and other improper influence in official and political matters in May 2017.

When charged, Hoye was transferred to Allegheny County Jail, according to court records.

While there, jail guards were in the process of giving Hoye a suicide gown “based on threats he made to harm himself,” said a criminal complaint. Hoye refused guards’ orders to be handcuffed and “then reached into the toilet and threw urine” on an officer, according to the complaint.

He was charged with assault by a prisoner, recklessly endangering another person and aggravated assault in January 2018.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected].com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.