Pittsburgh bomb plot only ‘puffery and bragging,’ says suspect’s attorney | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh bomb plot only ‘puffery and bragging,’ says suspect’s attorney

Megan Guza
1321330_web1_ptr-bombplot-062019
AP
Mustafa Mousab Alowemer, 21, is accused of plotting to bomb the Legacy International Worship Center in the North Side.
1321330_web1_ptr-bombsuspecthearing-062219
U.S. Attorney Scott Brady stands before other local law enforcement and speaks to the media following the preliminary hearing for Mustafa Mousab Alowemer, a Syrian refugee accused of plotting to blow up a Pittsburgh church.

As federal prosecutors laid out evidence Friday of a Syrian refugee’s alleged plot to bomb a North Side church in the name of ISIS, the man’s defense attorneys attempted to downplay his actual capabilities.

Mustafa Mousab Alowemer, 21, is accused of plotting with two other men – undercover federal agents, it turned out – to blow up the Legacy International Worship Center, a small stone church on a residential street.

His lawyer, Sam Saylor, portrayed Alowemer’s alleged plotting and planning as “puffery and bragging.” He said purchasing supplies one can buy at CVS or a hardware store – acetone nail polish remover, 9-volt batteries, ice packs and nails – doesn’t constitute a real step toward building an explosive.

Alowemer, slight in stature, appeared in court for the preliminary hearing in an orange jumpsuit and shackles. He gave his yes or no answers through an interpreter, who also translated all of the court proceedings.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Cynthia Eddy held all charges against Alowemer – one count of providing material support to a terrorist organization and two counts of distributing information relating to explosives. He waived his detention hearing and was remanded to the custody of U.S. Marshals.

The 90-minute hearing saw Assistant U.S. Attorney Soo Song call just one witness, Special Agent Gary Morgan of the Pittsburgh FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

Morgan laid out details of the plot and investigation that mirrored those in the 27-page criminal complaint filed Wednesday against Alowemer. He said federal agents first became aware of Alowemer’s online presence in 2018 and began communicating with him directly under the guise of another ISIS supporter earlier this year.

The online undercover agent put Alowemer in contact with another “ISIS brother” – another undercover federal agent. They, along with a confidential informant, developed the plot to bomb the Wilson Street church. Alowemer considered a mosque and other targets before settling on the church because he believed it was attended by Nigerian Christians.

Prosecutors showed two videos that Alowemer had sent the undercover agents. One was of him in a black hoodie with a white mask covering his lower face and speaking confidently in Arabic. Morgan alleged this was Alowemer’s bay’aa – a term he said ISIS supporters use to describe a demonstration of commitment to the extremist group.

The other video shows what appears to be an explosion that takes down multiple buildings, apparently in the Middle East. Morgan said Alowemer sent that video to the men he thought were his “brothers.”

Alowemer was arrested June 19 in what was to be his fifth meeting with undercover agents. They’d met four times prior, Morgan said, and each time Alowemer took the lead on planning and plotting the would-be attack.

“Mr. Alowemer laid out the plan in its entirety,” Morgan said.

Once detained at Pittsburgh’s FBI office on the city’s South Side, Alowemer admitted that he knew what he was doing constituted terrorism, Morgan said. He said the recent Brashear High School graduate also admitted to the online communications and the in-person meetings.

Pressed by Alowemer’s attorney,Morgan said Alowemer was offered an interpreter but turned it down. Morgan said Alowemer told agents he “felt pressured” in some way to commit the acts but also felt an “inner drive.”

Saylor’s questions of the agent focused on whether copies of all correspondence between Alowemer and the undercover agents exist, saying that Alowemer didn’t have the capabilities to build a bomb on his own.

The judge heard only one side of the story, Saylor said, in arguing that prosecutors didn’t have probable cause to charge his client.

The judge disagreed, holding the charges over for trial. Some family members of Alowemer’s cried as he was taken by U.S. Marshals.

In the courtroom along with family, friends and a slew of police and federal agents was Khalifah Al-Akili, a white Muslim convert who gained international attention in 2010 when he was the target of a botched FBI terrorism sting. He was detained in 2012, accused of promoting anti-American violence but had no ties to terrorist organizations.

He was sent to federal prison in 2013 not on terrorism charges but for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon.

As Alowemer was led from the courtroom, Al-Akili shouted what he later said was a verse from the Koran that translated to, “Verily, God is with those who have patience.” He called the case “manufactured” and said authorities were “creating a crime.”

No one associated with the case spoke following the hearing, and U.S. Attorney Scott Brady spoke only briefly and took no questions.

“The threats posed by terrorist organizations are real, and they’re reaching across our borders to spread their ideologies of hate,” Brady said. “We want those who raise these ideologies of hate to know that we will find you, we will prosecute you and we will bring you to justice.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.