Grand jury indicts Syrian refugee for alleged terror plot at North Side church | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Grand jury indicts Syrian refugee for alleged terror plot at North Side church

Megan Guza
1428123_web1_ptr-alowemerphotos01-062819
U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania
Mustafa Mousab Alowemer, shown in a still image taken from a video he allegedly sent to an undercover FBI agent he believed was a fellow ISIS sympathizer. The video allegedly comes from “Alowemer’s bay’aa,” a term federal agents said ISIS supporters use to demonstrate commitment to the group.

A federal grand jury indicted a 21-year-old Syrian refugee on charges he concocted plans to blow up a Pittsburgh church in the name of the terrorist organization ISIS, according to court records unsealed Thursday.

Mustafa Mousab Alowemer, who lived with his family in Northview Heights, has been in federal custody since June 19 when he was charged by complaint with one count of attempting to provide support to ISIS and two counts of distributing information relating to an explosive device.

The indictment differs from the complaint in that it is a finding by a grand jury that there is probable cause for the charges listed in the complaint.

Alowemer is accused of spending months communicating with two men he believed were fellow ISIS sympathizers, making plans to bomb the Legacy International Worship Center, a small stone church on the residential Wilson Street.

An attorney for Alowemer said during a preliminary hearing June 21 that the alleged plotting and planning by the 21-year-old was “puffery and bragging.”

The grand jury returned the indictment Wednesday, and it was unsealed a day later.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.