Teacher at CAPA school in Downtown Pittsburgh accused of sexually abusing student | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Teacher at CAPA school in Downtown Pittsburgh accused of sexually abusing student

Natasha Lindstrom
1487894_web1_web-school8
1487894_web1_ptr-clayton-01-010419

A teacher has resigned from his job at the Creative and Performing Arts 6-12 school in Downtown Pittsburgh after being charged with sexually abusing a student, officials said.

Samuel Karas, 28, of Carrick, was charged Wednesday with institutional sexual assault, court records show.

Karas — who has taught at the CAPA magnet school at 9th Street and Fort Duquesne Boulevard for the past six years — is accused of going on several “dates” with a female student under 18 and making indecent sexual contact with her, a criminal complaint said.

Karas could not immediately be reached. An attorney for Karas is not yet listed in court records.

Karas began working at CAPA on October 2013 as a part-time production technology teacher, then became a full-time teacher there in 2015, Pittsburgh Public Schools spokeswoman Ebony Pugh said.

District officials learned of the allegations against him on June 10, the day before school let out for summer for most students, Pugh said.

The district filed a report the same day with Childline, a hotline that tracks reports of child abuse across Pennsylvania, and placed Karas on paid administrative leave, Pugh said.

On July 18, Karas resigned from the district, with a retroactive effective date of June 14, the last day of the 2018-19 school year for PPS teachers, Pugh said.

“We immediately sent the teacher home,” Pugh said. “As the district was completing their due process, the teacher resigned.”

Police learned about the Childline report on June 12, and detectives with Pittsburgh police’s Sex Assault and Family Crisis unit began investigating, the complaint said.

Police say they learned from the victim — who was under 18 last year and recently graduated from CAPA — that Karas began spending time alone with her in June 2018, the complaint said.

After “a series of dates,” Karas’ behavior escalated during a specific incident on Dec. 2 when Karas invited the student to his home, according to the complaint.

The girl told police she dropped off her sister at a mall and then went to the house. Karas was still in the shower when she arrived, and she waited outside on the porch until he let her in, the complaint said.

Once inside, Karas gave the girl a tour of his home and suggested they watch TV together, the complaint said. In the kitchen, Karas began drinking an alcoholic beverage while the girl drank water.

They moved to the living room couch, “where (Karas) put his legs over hers and covered her with a blanket,” police wrote in the complaint.

Karas started kissing the girl for several minutes, then “moved her onto his lap during the kissing,” the complaint said.

The former teacher then told the girl that he wanted a “serious relationship” with her and “that he had deleted all of his dating apps from his cellphone,” the complaint said. He kissed her again as she was leaving and he was saying good night, the girl told police.

The district sent a report on the allegations to the Department of Education in June, Pugh said. She said school officials had not received any such prior allegations or complaints regarding Karas.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.