Thompson Run Road closure expanded after motorists ignore road-closed sign |

Thompson Run Road closure expanded after motorists ignore road-closed sign

Tony LaRussa

Lanes in both directions along a section of Thompson Run Road in Ross were shut down this afternoon after motorists ignored a road-closed sign for work being done in the southbound lane, according to officials.

The southbound lane was closed June 7 when a consultant conducting a routine inspection discovered that a stone abutment for Thompson Run Bridge No. 3 had washed away during recent storms. Engineers determined that the bridge could become structurally deficient if it is not fixed.

Stop signs were set up June 9 at both ends of the northbound land between Radcliff Drive and Babcock Boulevard to allow traffic from both directions to continue to use the road.

Initial plans called for closing off all southbound traffic for two weeks starting July 15 to create a construction zone and continuing to allow motorists to travel northbound.

But both lanes were closed after drivers continued to travel southbound, according to the officials.

“This (closing both lanes) is unfortunately necessary due to the failure of many motorists to abide by the road closed signs on the southbound side of Thompson Run,” said Ross Commissioner Dan DeMarco in social media post. “Ross Township Police issued 14 citations to motorists who ignored the signs.”

DeMarco said he also received several complaints about a near head-on collisions that occurred near the construction zone after a driver failed to heed the sign.

Traffic near the construction site will follow a detour using Siebert and McKnight road and Babcock Boulevard.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.