Lockdowns lifted at Pittsburgh schools, South Park school threat not credible | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Lockdowns lifted at Pittsburgh schools, South Park school threat not credible

1637536_web1_web-school9
file
Pittsburgh Brashear High School is on a modified lockdown after a potential threat on Sept. 6, 2019.

Lockdowns at two Pittsburgh schools were lifted by 10 a.m. Friday, and a threat made by a student in the South Park School District was deemed not credible, authorities said.

Pittsburgh Public Schools spokeswoman Ebony Pugh said a gun was found near Taylor Allderdice High School in Squirrel Hill at about 8:40 a.m. , prompting a lockdown that was lifted at 9:40 a.m.

Pittsburgh Brashear High School in Beechview also started Friday on a modified lockdown today after a potential threat was reported through the Safe2Say program, Pugh said.

That lockdown was lifted shortly after 10 a.m., Pugh said.

Safe2Say is a state-mandated program that was launched earlier this year and allows students and staff to report suspicious information anonymously.

Police were also investigating a potential threat made to students in the South Park School District, according to Trib news partner WPXI.

A letter sent to families from Superintendent Wayne Gdovic on Thursday said a student at South Park Elementary Center may have made a threat about bringing a weapon to school today.

Director of School Police Todd Naylor worked with the South Park Township department, spoke with the student’s family and determined the threat was not credible. The school was open as usual.

Tom Davidson and Tawnya Panizzi are Tribune-Review staff writers. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter @TribDavidson. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 1512, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.