Tree of Life survivors applaud proposed hate crime bills |

Tree of Life survivors applaud proposed hate crime bills

Bob Bauder
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Tree of Life Rabbi Jeffrey Myers (at podium) addresses reporters outside the Squirrel Hill synagogue on May 9, 2019, before the lawmakers gathered behind him outline proposed legislation that would enhance the state’s hate crimes laws. Left to right are state Reps. Ed Gainey and Dan Frankel, state Sens. Jay Costa and Lindsey Williams and Pittsburgh Public School Board President Lynda Wrenn.

Several survivors of a mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue lauded state lawmakers on Thursday for a package of proposed bills designed to enhance Pennsylvania hate crimes statutes.

State Reps. Dan Frankel of Squirrel Hill and Ed Gainey of Lincoln-Lemington and Sen. Jay Costa of Forest Hills, standing outside the shuttered synagogue, said they plan to introduce companion legislation in the House and Senate in coming weeks. All are Democrats.

Andrea Wedner, 62, of Squirrel Hill, who was wounded during the attack, and whose mother, Rose Mallinger, was killed, said the legislation was overdue.

“It feels like there is finally action being taken,” she said. “It’s not being ignored. I think this really affected everybody, and they’re not going to take it anymore. Enough is enough.”

Eleven worshipers died in the Oct. 27 attack. Robert Bowers, of Baldwin, is charged in connection with the killings. Authorities say he expressed hatred of Jews.

Tree of Life Rabbi Jeffrey Myers, who survived the rampage, said he was saddened by the need for such legislation.

“While I’m appreciative that Rep. Frankel and our legislature want to take action on this, it’s also a sad moment that we have to create laws because people just can’t work, live and play together,” Myers said. “I hope for the day where we don’t need these types of laws.”

The bills would:

  • Permit the Pennsylvania attorney general to investigate crimes of discrimination and ethnic intimidation.
  • Require those convicted of hate crimes as a condition of their probation or parole to perform community services or attend diversity training.
  • Require the Municipal Police Officers’ Education and Training Commission to train new police officers in identifying, investigating and reporting ethnic intimidation crimes.
  • Permit victims to sue those convicted of hate crimes.
  • Require colleges and universities to offer online and anonymous reporting procedures for hate crimes.
  • Require the state attorney general to create a hate crimes unit and maintain a data base of hate groups across the state. The database would be accessible only by law enforcement agencies.

Frankel said several dozen House members, including Republicans, have signed on as co-sponsors and the legislation has a good chance of passage.

“We stand here today on sacred ground,” Frankel said. “Eleven lives were cut short and countless others have been forever changed. These bills will expand and update our outdated laws so they can protect LGBTQ and disabled people, increase civil and criminal penalties for hate crimes, provide education for those who have been convicted of these crimes and improve the data for tracking hate crimes and hate criminals.”

At least one onlooker wasn’t convinced.

“I like the package, but I’m very pessimistic about its effect,” said Barry Werber, 77, of Stanton Heights, who survived the shooting by hiding in a storage closet. “You are going to have people attacking certain parts of it because of the First Amendment. You’re going to have a battle the same way you have over the Second Amendment.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.