ShareThis Page
Trial begins for man accused of killing family in Thanksgiving Day crash |

Trial begins for man accused of killing family in Thanksgiving Day crash

Megan Guza
Accident reconstruction experts investigate the scene of a crash that killed a couple and their toddler daughter on Thanksgiving Day in 2016.
Demetrius Coleman is charged in the 2016 Thanksgiving Day crash that killed a couple and their toddler daughter. Coleman allegedly fled a traffic stop and topped 100 mph in the moments before the crash.

Testimony began this week in the trial of man charged with killing a family of three Thanksgiving Day in 2016 as he tried to flee police near Route 30 in North Versailles.

David Bianco, his fiancée, Kaylie Meininger and her young daughter Annika died when their Ford Taurus burst into flames after Demetrius Coleman allegedly ran a red light and slammed into their car.

On Friday, prosecutors presented the 2-year-old child’s shoe as evidence, according to Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV.

Officers from North Versailles and East McKeesport pursued Demetrius Coleman after he fled a traffic stop along Route 30 on Nov. 24, 2016. Coleman reached speeds of almost 100 mph, police have said.

Jurors also heard audio from the police pursuit, according to the TV station.

On Thursday, jurors were shown the surveillance video from the gas station where police first stopped Coleman for making an illegal left turn. Police said he was driving without a valid license and was also wanted on an outstanding drug warrant.

WPXI reported that Coleman’s defense attorney did not dispute that Coleman was driving, but rather argued he did not intend for the crash to happen.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.