ShareThis Page
Charges dropped against woman in North Versailles theater altercation that went viral |

Charges dropped against woman in North Versailles theater altercation that went viral

Megan Guza
| Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:56 a.m

Melanie Carter pre-trial press conference

A judge on Thursday dismissed all charges against a Wilkinsburg woman arrested last year during an incident at a North Versailles movie theater.

Charges against Melanie Carter, 36, of resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and defiant trespass were dismissed by Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge David Cashman. The charges stemmed from a February 2018 incident outside the Phoenix Theatres North Versailles Stadium 18 cinema.

Carter confronted a theater manager and North Versailles police officer Christopher Kelly, who was working a security detail at the theater, as they ejected four black girls, ages 12 to 14. Carter recorded the incident on a cell phone, and the video went viral.

“What happens when we defend ourselves, what happens when we defend black women and girls? We get thrown to the ground, knee in our chest,” Carter said. “We get our faces smashed to the concrete and arrested with trumped up charges. These acts of violence are egregious.”

Carter alleged the manager called them animals. In the video, the unidentified manager steps to the camera and says, “Because you’re behaving like an animal.”

Kelly told Carter to leave and, when Carter refused, he tried to place her under arrest. Carter resisted, according to the criminal complaint written by Kelly, and he forced Carter to the ground.

“I didn’t know if I was going to survive that attack,” Carter said Thursday. “But I knew that if I did, that it was my duty to say something about it.”

Carter, an activist and artist who goes by the stage name Blak Rapp Madusa, wants to use her platform to spread awareness.

“We have to stop this violence against black women and girls,” Carter said. “We have to re-humanize black women and girls. We have to protect black women and girls.”

Carter is being represented by the Abolitionist Law Center. Miracle Jones, spokeswoman for the Abolitionist Law Center, said the entire incident is indicative of a larger problem.

She said black girls in Allegheny County experience violence at a rate higher than the national average, she said, citing “Inequities Affecting Black Girls in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County,” a 2016 study from the University of Pittsburgh’s Center on Race and Social Problems.

“When we’re talking about making sure we’re protecting and defending and re-humanizing black girls, there is a huge, huge need to do so,” Jones said.

Nicky Jo Dawson, activist and founder of empowerment organization BLAQK OPS, said it is ridiculous to still have to be having this conversation in this day and age.

“It’s 2019, and we still have to fight for our right to be black – for our right to stand up for children who are being discriminated against,” she said. “Had Melanie been a white woman, we would not be here.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

Megan Guza | Tribune-Review
Miracle Jones (left), spokeswoman for the Abolitionist Law Center, and activist Nicky Jo Dawson speak outside the Allegheny County Courthouse on Thursday, Jan. 10, 2019. The law center is representing Melanie Carter in her criminal trial.
Megan Guza | Tribune-Review
Melanie Carter, 36, of Wilkinsburg, speaks outside the Allegheny County Courthouse before her scheduled jury trial Thursday, Jan. 10, 2019. Carter was charged in February after she confronted a North Versailles police officer and a theater manager outside a North Versailles movie theater. The two men were ejecting four young black girls from the theater for alleged misbehavior.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.