Trial starts for man accused of killing McKeesport woman | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Trial starts for man accused of killing McKeesport woman

Megan Guza
1331404_web1_ptr-bizzelletrial-062519
Allegheny County Jail
Daniel Bizzelle

A bench trial began Monday for a man accused in a double shooting that left one woman dead and another man injured on the steps of a McKeesport bar in 2017.

Daniel Bizzelle, 27, is charged with homicide in the July 16, 2017, death of 23-year-old Samantha Klavora. He is charged with attempted homicide, aggravated assault and reckless endangerment for allegedly shooting and wounding another man in the shooting.

The surviving victim told police that he and Klavora were walking up a set of city steps on Fifth Avenue when they heard someone approach from behind, according to the criminal complaint against Bizzelle. He said he recognized the man as an acquaintance he knew only as “Boog Bray,” later identified as Bizelle.

The victim told police Bizzelle seemed to think he was responsible for the murder a month prior of 24-year-old Diaz Petty, also in McKeesport, according to the complaint. Bizzelle began shooting, and the victim tried to run. Klavora tried to step in, at which point Bizzelle allegedly turned the gun on her.

Klavora was shot six times in her torso and lower body, police said, and she was pronounced dead a short time later. Investigators said they found 13 spent cartridge casings at the scene, as well as several jacketed fragments and 10 individual strike marks on the concrete steps.

Police said the surviving victim picked Bizzelle out of a photo array.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.