Coraopolis man caught with loaded handgun at Pittsburgh International Airport |

Coraopolis man caught with loaded handgun at Pittsburgh International Airport

Madasyn Czebiniak
Transportation Security Administration
TSA officers at PIT Airport found this loaded gun in a man’s carry-on bag at the airport checkpoint on Monday, July 29, 2019.

A Coraopolis man was stopped at Pittsburgh International Airport on Monday morning after Transportation Security Administration officers found a loaded handgun in his carry-on bag.

TSA contacted the Allegheny County police, who responded to the airport checkpoint, confiscated the gun and detained the man for questioning.

The .380 caliber handgun is the 23rd gun stopped by federal workers at the airport checkpoint so far this year, according to the TSA. In 2018, TSA officers caught 34 firearms at the checkpoint.

The gun was loaded with 14 bullets, including one in the chamber, according to TSA.

People who bring guns to the checkpoint could face criminal charges, according to TSA. TSA has the authority to assess civil penalties of up to $13,333 for weapons violations. A typical first offense for carrying a handgun into a checkpoint is $4,000.

Travelers with concealed firearm permits aren’t allowed to bring guns onto airplanes in their carry-on bags.

TSA has details on how to properly travel with a firearm posted on its website. The complete list of penalties associated with trying to bring a gun on a plane in a carry-on bag also is posted online.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.