ShareThis Page
2 charged in Monroeville kidnapping plead not guilty | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

2 charged in Monroeville kidnapping plead not guilty

Dillon Carr
| Friday, March 1, 2019 2:06 p.m.
822292_web1_ptr-kidnap-mugs-021319
Justice J. McCallum (l) and Derrick D. Duke
822292_web1_ptr-kidnap01-021319
Justice McCallum, 24, of Penn Hills (right) and Derrick Duke, 25, of Swissvale are placed in a Monroeville Police Department vehicle to be transported to Allegheny County Jail on Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2019.

Two men pleaded not guilty at a preliminary hearing March 1 after being charged in the February kidnapping of a Monroeville woman and demanding $50,000 and four pounds of marijuana from her son.

All charges against Justice J. McCallum, 24, of Penn Hills and Derrick D. Duke, 25, of Swissvale were upheld by District Judge Jeffrey Herbst in Monroeville.

The suspects are scheduled for a formal arraignment April 17 at Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

McCallum and Duke were arrested Feb. 12 after leading police and FBI officers on a short chase through Pittsburgh that ended when their vehicle crashed into a city Department of Public Works truck.

The suspects are believed to be two out of at least five allegedly involved in the kidnapping of a Monroeville woman Feb. 11. Police continue to search for more suspects.

According to the criminal complaint, the woman saw several shapes in the tree line by her Shaw Avenue house when she got home that evening. She called her son, David Quick — who was in the Shaw Avenue house — and told him to call police.

Quick, 24, testified as a witness during the preliminary hearing. He said after his girlfriend called Monroeville police, he got a call from his mother’s cell phone. “(The kidnappers) said my mom was kidnapped and to drop the money off on Kelly Street on top of a trash can,” Quick testified.

He said the ransom amounts changed from $40,000 to $50,000 with four pounds of marijuana and two guns. They eventually agreed on $11,000 in cash as ransom for his mother.

The criminal complaint said Quick left Shaw Avenue to drop off the money as detectives worked to set up surveillance of the property on Kelly Street. Officers raced ahead of him to try to locate the alleged kidnappers once the ransom was delivered.

When Quick delivered the cash, McCallum and Duke — who arrived in a blue Ford Escape, police said — picked up the cash and a chase started. During the chase, police said Duke jumped out of the vehicle and was arrested shortly after.

McCallum, the alleged driver, led police on the chase that ended when he crashed into a city Department of Public Works truck. He ran from the crash and was apprehended when he got caught in a fence on the 200 block of Polk Way.

Meanwhile, the mother escaped an abandoned house on Kelly Street by untying her feet and hopping outside to a neighboring house, pleading for help, according to the complaint.

Officers received a call from a person on Ladson Street around 2:30 a.m. saying there was a woman tied to a chair on the porch. A Monoreville detective who testified Friday said the woman was found with her feet still tied and bruises on her wrists and face.

Duke is charged with kidnapping, robbery of a motor vehicle, criminal conspiracy, simple assault, theft by extortion, recklessly endangering another person and unlawful restraint.

McCallum faces the same charges but will also face fleeing or attempting to elude police officers and reckless driving.

Robert Mielnicki, McCallum’s attorney, said he doesn’t believe prosecutors presented enough evidence to charge his client with robbery of a motor vehicle and simple assault.

He also thought Quick’s involvement with the case was strange. “If you got a call from a random person in the evening hours asking for $11,000, would you be able to come up with the cash? Wouldn’t that be a little strange?” Mielnicki said. “I mean, why are they asking you for that?”

Tamara Vara, McCallum’s cousin, said there are a lot of holes in the prosecutor’s case against him.

“He’s innocent until proven guilty,” she said after the hearing. When asked about what holes she thought were in the case, she declined to specify. “They had errors, a lot of errors… Just lies, basically,” Vara said.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.