Two charged with firing guns near Coraopolis police station |

Two charged with firing guns near Coraopolis police station

Jacob Tierney

Coraopolis police have identified two men who were arrested in connection with gunfire near the police station early Tuesday morning.

A third man, who has not been identified, has contacted the department and is expected to turn himself in Wednesday, police said.

Nathan John Fishbourne, 29 and Brandon Michael Youngworth, 25, both of Coraopolis, are charged with prohibited use of an offensive weapon, recklessly endangering another person, criminal conspiracy, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.

Coraopolis police officers said they heard gunshots as they were leaving their station around 3:15 a.m., coming from the nearby Montour Industrial Park.

After calling in backup from neighboring departments, they moved in around sunrise and apprehended two men on the industrial park property, according to police.

They also seized a 12-gauge shotgun.

There were multiple .40 caliber shell casings found on the scene, but police did not find a corresponding weapon.

Police believe that weapon was in possession of a third man who left the scene before officers arrived. When that man turns himself in he will be expected to turn over the gun, police said.

It’s still unclear why the men were shooting, police said. They shot across the Ohio River, in the direction of the Robert Morris University Island Sports Center, on Neville Island.

Fishbourne and Youngworth are both out of jail on $10,000 cash bail each. They are expected to appear for a preliminary hearing before District Judge Leonard J. Hromyak July 16.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.