2 Pittsburgh men plead guilty in West End drug trafficking | TribLIVE.com

2 Pittsburgh men plead guilty in West End drug trafficking

Michael DiVittorio

Two Pittsburgh residents pleaded guilty in federal court to their role in drug trafficking activity in the city’s West End neighborhood.

Jaamiyl Dean, 42, admitted guilt to one count of conspiracy to possess firearms in furtherance of drug trafficking.

Tyree Davis, 35, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine.

Charges stem from a wiretap investigation into West End drug activity.

The FBI and DEA initiated a wiretap investigation in 2017, primarily targeting the GBK street gang and drug trafficking in and around an area known as the Greenway Projects in Pittsburgh.

Authorities said Dean was heard over the wiretap discussing drug transactions.

Agents recovered two firearms, several rounds of ammunition, drug packaging materials, and more than $64,000 in cash as part of a search warrant executed at Dean’s home and vehicle on June 20, 2018.

Dean was prohibited from possessing firearms due to previous felony convictions, authorities said.

The wiretap investigation also revealed Davis and his co-conspirators distributed crack cocaine in and around the Greenway Projects from November 2017 through June 2018.

Dean is expected to be sentenced by Senior U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton on Nov. 8.

Davis is expected to be sentenced by Senior U.S. Untied States District Judge Arthur J. Schwab on Nov. 25.

The FBI and DEA jointly led the multi-agency investigation, which included Pittsburgh police, Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office, Pennsylvania State Police, the state Attorney General’s Office and officers from Robinson, Stowe Township, Wilkinsburg and McKees Rocks.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.