U.S. Attorney: Butler woman tried to embarrass people with medical records | TribLIVE.com

U.S. Attorney: Butler woman tried to embarrass people with medical records

Chuck Biedka

A 62-year-old woman working with private medical records shared that information in order to embarrass and distress the people, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh.

Linda Sue Kalina, of Butler, was sentenced to a year in federal prison followed by three years of supervision for violating health privacy law.

Prosecutors said for about 14 months in 2016 and 2017, Kalina worked as a patient information coordinator for the UPMC-affiliated Tri Rivers Musculoskeletal Centers at Mars. She violated the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPA) by getting health records for 111 people, “none of whom had been patients of TRMC and many of whom were co-workers, former classmates and relatives,” the government said.

According to federal records, the information included names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers and medical data.

Kalina was fired from TRMC. Then she worked for about a month for Allegheny Health Network, apparently without telling anyone about being fired, until she was caught disclosing personal health information for two people whose records she didn’t have authority to access “with the intent to cause them embarrassment and mental distress.”

Allegheny Health fired her six days later.

According to court records, she could have received a stiffer sentence, but when she pleaded guilty to one count the government dismissed five others.

Documents related to sentencing have been sealed from public view. A federal official who released the news wasn’t available for questions.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.